Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Santri Using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
The evaluation of Santri in Islamic boarding schools plays an important role in measuring academic and non-academic achievements; however, the assessment process often lacks transparency and tends to be centralized, leading to subjective and inefficient decision making. This study proposes a Decision Support System (DSS) based on the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method to optimize the Santri evaluation process by considering 10 distinct academic and non-academic criteria in a systematic and objective manner. The research stages include requirement analysis, system design, implementation, and functional testing using the Black Box method to ensure reliable operation. The experimental results involving a dataset of 10 santri show that the proposed SAW-based approach is able to accurately automate the normalization and final score calculation processes. To validate the system's performance, the DSS-generated rankings were compared against the manual evaluation results from the boarding school administrators, achieving an accuracy rate of 80%. Furthermore, consistency testing demonstrated that the system maintains a stable and proportional ranking outcome when tested repeatedly. These findings confirm that the application of the SAW method significantly improves transparency, fairness, and efficiency in supporting decision making for Santri assessment.
Rincian Artikel
Terbitan
Bagian
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cara Mengutip
Referensi
[1] T. Fajriah and E. R. Ningsih, “Pengaruh Teknologi Komunikasi Terhadap Interaksi Sosial Di Era Digital,” Merdeka Indonesia Journal International (MIJI), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 149–158, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.5555/miji.v4i1.99.
[2] D. Sudiantini, A. Naiwasha, A. Izzati, A. Ayunia, B. Putri, and C. Rindiani, “Penggunaan Teknologi Pada Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Di Dalam Era Digital Sekarang,” Digital Bisnis: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen dan E-Commerce, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 262–269, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30640/digital.v2i2.1082
[3] D. Mardian, N. Neneng, A. S. Puspaningrum, A. Hasibuan, and M. H. Tinambunan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Siswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Weight Product (WP),” Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 158–166, 2023, doi: 10.33365/jatika.v4i2.2593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jatika.v4i2.2593
[4] F. Seran, Y. P. K. Kelen, and D. Nababan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Jurusan Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product,” Jurnal Tekno Kompak, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 147, 2023, doi: 10.33365/jtk.v17i1.2154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jtk.v17i1.2154
[5] R. Remiswal, F. Hasbi, and Y. P. Diani, “Model Kepemimpinan Di Pondok Pesantren,” PRODU: Prokurasi Edukasi Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63–78, 2020, doi: 10.15548/p-prokurasi.v2i1.2052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/p-prokurasi.v2i1.2052
[6] B. M. R. Hidayati and A. Miftahurrohmah, “Strategi Pengembangan Literasi Digital Santri Melalui Pers Mahrusy di Pondok Pesantren Lirboyo,” Jurnal Kopis: Kajian Penelitian dan Pemikiran Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 146–160, 2023, doi: 10.33367/kpi.v5i2.2952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33367/kpi.v5i2.2952
[7] J. D. Manik, A. R. Samosir, and M. Mesran, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting dalam Penerimaan Siswa Magang Pada Universitas Budi Darma,” Sudo Jurnal Teknik Informatika, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 51–59, 2022, doi: 10.56211/sudo.v1i2.14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56211/sudo.v1i2.14
[8] C. T. Surya Wigatil, S. Ipnuwati, and K. Zuhri, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Santri Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode SAW (Studi Kasus : Pondok Pesantren Al-Ma’ruf Lampung),” Jurnal Teknologi dan Informatika (JEDA), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.57084/jeda.v3i1.992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57084/jeda.v3i1.992
[9] A. Aulia, T. Afrizal, and U. Wirantasa, “Penerapan Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Beasiswa Luar Negeri oleh LPDP Dengan Menggunakan Metode SAW,” SEMNAS RISTEK, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 66–77, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/semnasristek.v9i1.7673
[10] J. Prasetiana, Ravie K. Laday, and Satria, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Santri Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weigthing (Saw) Pondok Pesantren Al - Washilah,” ISTA Online Technologi Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 46–55, 2024, doi: 10.62702/ion.v5i1.106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62702/ion.v5i1.106
[11] Z. Fatah and F. Muqtadir, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Santri Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weigthing (SAW),” RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 8505–8517, 2025, doi: 10.31004/riggs.v4i3.3281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i3.3281
[12] B. Hendrik, T. Informatika, U. Putra, I. Upi, and Y. Padang, “Review Metode Sistem Pendukung Keputusan ( SPK ) Terbaik untuk Seleksi Proposal Penelitian : Evaluasi Berdasarkan Kriteria Efektivitas dan Akurasi,” Journal of Education Research, vol. 0738, no. 4, pp. 6456–6462, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1960
[13] G. Rinaldi, K. Theodorakos, F. Crema Garcia, O. M. Agudelo, and B. De Moor, “DSS4EX: A Decision Support System framework to explore Artificial Intelligence pipelines with an application in time series forecasting,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 269, p. 126421, 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.ESWA.2025.126421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126421
[14] A. Ramadhan and S. Supatman, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Pada PT. Avo Innovation Technology Dengan Metode Simple Addivite Weighting (SAW),” Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 256–267, 2022, doi: 10.47233/JTEKSIS.V4I1.484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47233/jteksis.v4i1.484
[15] P. Sakinah, N. Hayati, and A. E. Syaputra, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Laptop Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” Jurnal Sistim Informasi dan Teknologi, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 130–138, 2023, doi: 10.37034/JSISFOTEK.V5I2.222.
[16] I. Z. Mukhametzyanov, “On the Conformity of Scales of Multidimensional Normalization: an Application for the Problems of Decision,” Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 399–431, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame05012023i
[17] A. R. Krishnan, M. R. Hamid, G. H. Tanakinjal, M. F. Asli, B. Boniface, and M. F. Ghazali, “An investigation to offer conclusive recommendations on suitable benefit/cost criteria-based normalization methods for TOPSIS,” MethodsX, vol. 10, p. 102227, 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.MEX.2023.102227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102227
[18] S. Sumiyatun, S. Sudarmanto, C. Subiyantoro, and T. E. Tarigan, “Penggunaan Metode SAW dan AHP dalam Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai untuk Pemberian Penghargaan,” Fahma : Jurnal Informatika Komputer, Bisnis dan Manajemen, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 54–65, 2024, doi: 10.61805/FAHMA.V22I3.147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61805/fahma.v22i3.147
[19] R. Sumanti, P. Natai, D. Rusda, and A. Purwanto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Bibit Ikan Nila Terbaik Menggunakan Metode SAW Dan AHP,” Jurnal Tekno Kompak, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 105–120, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jtk.v19i1.4591