Intelektual (Jurnal Administrasi Publik dan Ilmu Komunikasi) is eager to provide a rapid publication process through an initial assessment conducted by an editorial committee consisting of members of the editorial team. The main purpose is to decide whether to send the paper for peer review or to reject it.

The decision to publish a paper is based on an editorial assessment and peer review. Initially, all papers are assessed by an editorial committee consisting of members of the editorial team. The primary purpose is to decide whether to send a paper for peer review and to give a rapid decision on those that are not. The rejection is based on the novelty or the relevance to the scope of this journal.

Sometimes, a paper will be returned to the author with a request for revisions to help editors in deciding whether or not to send it out for review. Authors may expect a decision from this stage of the review process within 1-2 weeks of submission.

In the reviewing process, there are at least two reviewers for each manuscript on the related topic. Judgment from the reviewers will be the main priority on which the editors will make their decision, with the conditions minimum of two reviewers. The final decision to publish is made by the editor in chief and, editorial committee by considering the advice from reviewers. Three weeks will be needed for the reviewer to complete one round of the reviewing process.

All of the reviewing process is done by way of a blind review and is managed by the editor in our editorial system.